Howarth & Smith
About the Firm Attorneys In The News Lectures Internships Events Contact Us
 

THE NATIONAL

LAW JOURNAL

VOL. 19, NO 24                                                                                                   Monday, February 10, 1997         

 THE BIG

NUMBERS

OF 1996

 

Verdicts

 

Career Move: Don Howarth's clients William B. Forti and Delores Blanton fought General Dynamics, claiming breach of oral contract.
CASE: Forti v. General Dynamics Corp.,
KC 016 871 (Super Ct., Los Angeles)

PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEYS: Don Howarth
and Brian D. Bubb, of Los Angeles'
Howarth & Smith

DEFENSE ATTORNEYS: Linda L. Listrom
and Gregory S. Gallopoulos. of
Chicago's Jenner & Block; Michael W.
Mugg, of San Bernardino, Calif.'s Mac
Lachlan, Burford& Arias

JURY VERDICT: $107.4 million, reduced
to $37.45 million

IN 1990, William B. Forti was working in business development and Delores Blanton was working as an administrator at General Dynamics Corp., when their employer asked them to leave their positions to help develop a new subsidiary called E-Metrics, said plaintiffs' attorney Don Howarth. E-Metrics would attempt to develop commercial products based on General Dynamics patents in neural network technology.

As founders, Mr. Forti and Ms. Blanton were to receive an equity share in the subsidiary, Mr. Howarth said. Five other General Dynamics employees were offered the same deal, he added.

In 1992, General Dynamics sold E-Metrics, along with other divisions of its Air Research Defense Systems, to Hughes Aircraft Corp. for about $500 million, Mr. Howarth said. The E-Metrics employees received nothing from the sale, so Mr. Forti and Ms. Blanton sued General Dynamics, charging breach of oral contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. The other employees did not sue, Mr. Howarth said.

Company executives denied at trial that any promises of ownership had been given. General Dynamics also denied that E-Metrics was worth anything. "E-Metrics was never able to find customers or outside investors for its technology," the company said in a public statement.

But on July 26, 1996, a Los Angeles jury awarded each plaintiff $3.7 million in compensatory damages and $50 million in punitives, for a total of $107.4 million. In October, Superior Court Judge Chris R. Conway sliced the punitives from $100 million to $30 million, then added $50,000 to the judgment for costs. The case is on appeal. 

Home

Disclaimer